PA Bill Number: HB1950
Title: In hunting and furtaking, further providing for unlawful devices and methods.
Description: In hunting and furtaking, further providing for unlawful devices and methods. ...
Last Action: Referred to Game & Fisheries
Last Action Date: Mar 18, 2026
Yes, gun-free zones are targets - and research proves it :: 07/13/2016
To the editor: Evan DeFilippis’ and Devin Hughes’ op-ed article defending gun control and criticizing my research is filled with flaws. (“5 arguments against gun control — and why they are all wrong,” Opinion, July 8)
The authors say that a good guy with a gun can’t stop mass public shootings, but they miss dozens of cases where police and prosecutors say concealed-carry permit holders saved multiple lives. These cases aren’t included in any FBI data. My research in the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences’ newsletter ACJS Today (in March 2015) also showed the FBI missed 20 mass public shootings.
They claim that I have misrepresented places as gun-free zones. Yes, an armed, identifiable off-duty officer was guarding the nightclub in Orlando, Fla., when the shooting took place last month, but my point is that such guards are the first people to be shot at. The benefit of civilian concealed carry is that killers don’t know who might stop them.
DeFilippis and Hughes ignore explicit statements by mass public shooters on why they pick gun-free zones: because it makes victims easier targets.
John R. Lott Jr., Swarthmore, Pa.
The writer is president of the Crime Prevention Research Center.
