proposed laws

PA Bill Number: SB147

Title: In Pennsylvania Game Commission, further providing for accountability; and, in hunting and furtaking, further providing for hunting on Sunday ...

Description: In Pennsylvania Game Commission, further providing for accountability; and, in hunting and furtaking, further providing for hunting on Sunday ... ...

Last Action: Second consideration, with amendments (37-13)

Last Action Date: Jun 25, 2019

more >>

upcoming events

Rep. Guy Reschenthaler, A Special Audience With Rep. Jim Jordan - 06/27/2019
New Stanton Fire Hall 108 S. Main Street New Stanton, PA


Freedom Rally - 07/13/2019
Bandstand Park Elk Street at South Park Street, Franklin, PA


FOAC Monthly Meeting - 07/14/2019
South Fayette Township Municipal Building 515 Millers Run Road, Morgan, PA

More events

decrease font size   increase font size

Supreme Court refuses to consider whether Second Amendment protects gun silencers :: 06/11/2019

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court refused Monday to decide if the Second Amendment protects gun silencers such as the one used in last month's Virginia Beach shooting that killed 12 people.

Without comment or dissent, the justices turned away petitions from the operator of a Kansas army-surplus store and one of his customers who purchased an unregistered silencer in violation of federal law.

Two lower federal courts previously ruled that gun silencers fall outside the scope of the  Second Amendment because they are accessories not in common use by law-abiding citizens.

The Trump administration had urged the Supreme Court not to hear the challenge. Solicitor General Noel Francisco wrote that the Second Amendment protects the right to keep and bear "arms," and that restrictions on silencers don't burden the ability to use a gun for self-defense.

In addition, Francisco noted that the high court previously acknowledged that the Second Amendment permits banning "dangerous and unusual weapons."

"Many courts have upheld restrictions on silencers on the alternative ground that silencers are dangerous and unusual," he wrote.

Lawyers for Jeremy Kettler, who purchased a silencer from store owners Shane Cox, argued in court papers that silencers "are almost never used in crime" and that states "have increasingly recognized that suppressors are not dangerous." They said Kettler, a disabled veteran, wanted to protect his hearing.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/06/10/gun-rights-second-amendment-supreme-court-wont-hear-challenge-ban-gun-silencers/1407871001/