proposed laws

PA Bill Number: HB2170

Title: In assault, further providing for assault of law enforcement officer; and making editorial changes.

Description: In assault, further providing for assault of law enforcement officer; and making editorial changes. ...

Last Action: Referred to JUDICIARY

Last Action Date: Mar 28, 2024

more >>

decrease font size   increase font size

Law Professors File Brief Opposing 9th Circuit Rehearing in Second Amendment Lawsuit :: 10/07/2016

Sacramento, CA -(AmmoLand.com)- Firearms Policy Foundation (FPF) announced today that it has joined Law Professors Randy Barnett (Georgetown University Law Center), Robert J. Cottrol (George Washington University Law School), Brannon Denning (Cumberland School of Law), Michael O’Shea (Oklahoma City University School of Law), and Glenn Harlan Reynolds (University of Tennessee College of Law) in filing a legal brief opposing a full Ninth Circuit rehearing in the Second Amendment lawsuit Teixeira v. County of Alameda, which was decided by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in May.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Law Professors File Brief Opposing Ninth Circuit Rehearing in Second Amendment Lawsuit Challenging Alameda County Gun Store Ban

In its panel decision, the Ninth Circuit reversed a dismissal by federal District Court Judge William Horsley Orrick III, holding that the district court should have applied heightened scrutiny in evaluating whether or not the County of Alameda, California’s ordinance banning gun stores within 500 feet of any residentially zoned district, school, day care center, any other firearms sales business, liquor stores, or bars was an unconstitutional infringement of Second Amendment rights.

“The right of law-abiding citizens to keep and to bear arms is not a second-class right,” wrote Judge Diarmuid O’Scannlain in the decision, quoting in part the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark McDonald v. Chicago opinion. “Thus far…. the County has failed to justify the burden it has placed on the right of law-abiding citizens to purchase guns. The Second Amendment requires something more rigorous than the unsubstantiated assertions offered to the district court.”

The law professors’ brief, filed today, argued in part that “The panel opinion applied standard constitutional principles to the Second Amendment, just as they have been applied before to the First Amendment, to reproductive rights, and to other rights. There is no reason for the en banc court to consider the question anew.”

Eugene Volokh, a UCLA law professor who has written and taught extensively about the First and Second Amendments, wrote the brief on behalf of the amici Firearms Policy Foundation and law professors. Before joining the UCLA faculty 20 years ago, Volokh clerked for Judge Alex Kozinski of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and Justice Sandra Day O’Connor of the U.S. Supreme Court. He also operates the popular legal blog “The Volokh Conspiracy,” now hosted at the Washington Post.

A copy of the brief can be viewed or downloaded at www.firearmsfoundation.org/teixeira.

About the Firearms Policy Foundation:

Firearms Policy Foundation is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization. FPF’s mission is to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States and the People’s rights, privileges and immunities deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition, especially the inalienable, fundamental, and individual right to keep and bear arms.

For more information, visit: www.firearmsfoundation.org.

http://www.ammoland.com/2016/10/law-professors-file-brief-opposing-9th-circuit-rehearing-in-second-amendment-lawsuit/#axzz4MOxeZzRq