PA Bill Number: HB2663
Title: Providing for older adults protective services; and making a repeal.
Description: Providing for older adults protective services; and making a repeal. ...
Last Action: Referred to AGING AND OLDER ADULT SERVICES
Last Action Date: Nov 19, 2024
CHARLESTON - Attorney General Patrick Morrisey continues the fight for firearm rights in the U.S. Court of Appeals. :: 11/25/2014
On Tuesday the [South Carolina] AG’s office announced that Morrisey led a bipartisan coalition of 21 state attorneys general in an amicus, or friend of the court, brief urging the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to declare unconstitutional a Maryland law that forbids the possession, sale, transfer or receipt of certain firearms.
The brief argues Maryland’s law violates citizens’ core Second Amendment right to keep firearms in their home for self-protection. Plaintiffs in the case, Kolbe, et al., argued that the Maryland ban completely prohibited the possession of commonly used firearms and some of the most popular guns used by citizens for self-defense. A U.S. District Court ruled the law did not violate the constitution.
“Our Office is committed to defending law-abiding citizens’ Second Amendment rights, and we believe this law clearly violates the Constitution,” Morrisey said. “This law’s broad categorical ban is no different than trying to impose a content-based ban on speech. It simply cannot be done.”
In their brief, Morrisey and the other state attorneys general argue the Maryland law runs counter to previous Court decisions that deemed other bans prohibiting citizens’ private ownership of other common firearms as unconstitutional.
West Virginia was joined in the brief by the states of Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Florida, Idaho, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, and Wyoming, as well as the Commonwealth of Kentucky.
“We are proud to have led this bipartisan group of states in this amicus brief,” Morrisey said. “States must band together in times when they see citizens’ rights being diminished or infringed upon. If the courts decide this law passes muster, it would undermine a core part of the Second Amendment.”
http://www.gilberttimes.net/news/news/150640618/Continuing-the-Second-Amendment-fight
