| PRINTER'S NO. 561  | 
THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA
HOUSE BILL
No.  | 518  | Session of 2013  | 
INTRODUCED BY WATERS, BISHOP, SCHLOSSBERG, THOMAS, V. BROWN, COHEN, ROEBUCK, KINSEY, BROWNLEE, BRIGGS, GAINEY, KIRKLAND, SIMS, STURLA AND SANTARSIERO, FEBRUARY 5, 2013
REFERRED TO COMMITEE ON JUDICIARY, FEBRUARY 5, 2013
AN ACT
1Amending Title 18 (Crimes and Offenses) of the Pennsylvania
 2Consolidated Statutes, in general principles of
 3justification, further providing for definitions, for use of
 4force in self-protection, for use of force for the protection
 5of property and for use of force by persons with special
 6responsibility for care, discipline or safety of others.
7The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
 8hereby enacts as follows:
9Section 1.   Section 501 of Title 18 of the Pennsylvania
 10Consolidated Statutes is amended by adding a definition to read:
11§ 501.   Definitions.
12Subject to additional definitions contained in subsequent
 13provisions of this chapter which are applicable to specific
 14provisions of this chapter, the following words and phrases,
 15when used in this chapter shall have, unless the context clearly
 16indicates otherwise, the meanings given to them in this section:
17* * *
18"Public safety dispatcher."   An individual that has fulfilled
 19all minimum training and certification standards for emergency
 	
						
						1dispatchers, call takers and supervisors who work for 911
 2emergency communications centers or remote dispatch points in
 3this Commonwealth in accordance with 4 Pa. Code Ch. 120c
 4(relating to training and certification standards for 911
 5emergency communications personnel).
6* * *
7Section 2.   Section 505(b)(1), (2), (2.2), (2.3) and (2.4) of
 8Title 18 are amended to read:
9§ 505.   Use of force in self-protection.
10* * *
11(b)   Limitations on justifying necessity for use of force.--
12(1)   The use of force is not justifiable under this
 13section:
14(i)   to resist an arrest which the actor knows is
 15being made by a peace officer, although the arrest is
 16unlawful; [or]
17(ii)   to resist force used by the occupier or
 18possessor of property or by another person on his behalf,
 19where the actor knows that the person using the force is
 20doing so under a claim of right to protect the property,
 21except that this limitation shall not apply if:
22(A)   the actor is a public officer acting in the
 23performance of his duties or a person lawfully
 24assisting him therein or a person making or assisting
 25in a lawful arrest;
26(B)   the actor has been unlawfully dispossessed
 27of the property and is making a reentry or recaption
 28justified by section 507 of this title (relating to
 29use of force for the protection of property); or
30(C)   the actor believes that such force is
 	
						
						1necessary to protect himself against death or serious
 2bodily injury[.];
3(iii)   if the actor knows that he can avoid the
 4necessity of using such force with complete safety by
 5retreating; or
6(iv)   if the actor was instructed by a peace officer
 7or public safety dispatcher to not pursue another person.
8(2)   The use of deadly force is not justifiable under
 9this section unless the actor believes that such force is
 10necessary to protect himself against death, serious bodily
 11injury, kidnapping or sexual intercourse compelled by force
 12or threat; nor is it justifiable if:
13(i)   the actor, with the intent of causing death or
 14serious bodily injury, provoked the use of force against
 15himself in the same encounter; [or]
16(ii)   the actor knows that he can avoid the necessity
 17of using such force with complete safety by retreating[,
 18except the actor is not obliged to retreat from his
 19dwelling or place of work, unless he was the initial
 20aggressor or is assailed in his place of work by another
 21person whose place of work the actor knows it to be.]; or
22(iii)   the actor was instructed by a peace officer or
 23a public safety dispatcher to not pursue another person.
24* * *
25(2.2)   The presumption set forth in paragraph (2.1) does
 26not apply if:
27(i)   the person against whom the force is used has
 28the right to be in or is a lawful resident of the
 29dwelling, residence or vehicle, such as an owner or
 30lessee;
						1(ii)   the person sought to be removed is a child or
 2grandchild or is otherwise in the lawful custody or under
 3the lawful guardianship of the person against whom the
 4protective force is used;
5(iii)   the actor is engaged in a criminal activity or
 6is using the dwelling, residence or occupied vehicle to
 7further a criminal activity; [or]
8(iv)   the person against whom the force is used is a 
9peace officer acting in the performance of his official 
10duties and the actor using force knew or reasonably 
11should have known that the person was a peace officer[.];
12(v)   the actor knows that he can avoid the necessity
 13of using such force with complete safety by retreating;
 14or
15(vi)   the actor was instructed by a peace officer or
 16public safety dispatcher to not pursue another person.
17[(2.3)   An actor who is not engaged in a criminal 
18activity, who is not in illegal possession of a firearm and 
19who is attacked in any place where the actor would have a 
20duty to retreat under paragraph (2)(ii) has no duty to 
21retreat and has the right to stand his ground and use force, 
22including deadly force, if:
23(i)   the actor has a right to be in the place where
 24he was attacked;
25(ii)   the actor believes it is immediately necessary
 26to do so to protect himself against death, serious bodily
 27injury, kidnapping or sexual intercourse by force or
 28threat; and
29(iii)   the person against whom the force is used
 30displays or otherwise uses:
						1(A)   a firearm or replica of a firearm as defined
 2in 42 Pa.C.S. § 9712 (relating to sentences for
 3offenses committed with firearms); or
4(B)   any other weapon readily or apparently
 5capable of lethal use.
6(2.4)   The exception to the duty to retreat set forth   
7under paragraph (2.3) does not apply if the person against
 8whom the force is used is a peace officer acting in the
 9performance of his official duties and the actor using force
 10knew or reasonably should have known that the person was a
 11peace officer.]
12* * *
13Section 3.   Section 507(c) of Title 18 is amended by adding
 14paragraphs to read:
15§ 507.   Use of force for the protection of property.
16* * *
17(c)   Limitations on justifiable use of force.--
18* * *
19(3.1)   The use of force to prevent or terminate a
 20trespass is not justifiable under this section if:
21(i)   the actor knows that he can avoid the necessity
 22of using such force with complete safety by retreating;
 23or
24(ii)   the actor was instructed by a peace officer or
 25public safety dispatcher to not pursue another person.
26* * *
27(5)   The use of deadly force is not justifiable under
 28this section if:
29(i)   the actor knows that he can avoid the necessity
 30of using such force with complete safety by retreating;
 	
						
						1or
2(ii)   the actor was instructed by a peace officer or
 3public safety dispatcher to not pursue another person.
4* * *
5Section 4.   Section 509 of Title 18 is amended to read:
6§ 509.   Use of force by persons with special responsibility for
 7care, discipline or safety of others.
8(a)   Justifiable use of force.--The use of force upon or
 9toward the person of another is justifiable if:
10(1)   The actor is the parent or guardian or other person
 11similarly responsible for the general care and supervision of
 12a minor or a person acting at the request of such parent,
 13guardian or other responsible person and:
14(i)   the force is used for the purpose of
 15safeguarding or promoting the welfare of the minor,
 16including the preventing or punishment of his misconduct;
 17and
18(ii)   the force used is not designed to cause or
 19known to create a substantial risk of causing death,
 20serious bodily injury, disfigurement, extreme pain or
 21mental distress or gross degradation.
22(2)   The actor is a teacher or person otherwise entrusted
 23with the care or supervision for a special purpose of a minor
 24and:
25(i)   the actor believes that the force used is
 26necessary to further such special purpose, including the
 27maintenance of reasonable discipline in a school, class
 28or other group, and that the use of such force is
 29consistent with the welfare of the minor; and
30(ii)   the degree of force, if it had been used by the
 	
						
						1parent or guardian of the minor, would not be
 2unjustifiable under paragraph (1)(ii).
3(3)   The actor is the guardian or other person similarly
 4responsible for the general care and supervision of an
 5incapacitated, mentally ill or mentally retarded person; and:
6(i)   the force is used for the purpose of
 7safeguarding or promoting the welfare of the
 8incapacitated, mentally ill or mentally retarded person,
 9including the prevention of his misconduct, and there is
 10no reasonable alternative to the use of such force; and
11(ii)   the force used is not designed to cause or
 12known to create a substantial risk of causing death,
 13bodily injury, disfigurement, unnecessary pain, mental
 14distress, or humiliation.
15(4)   The actor is a doctor or other therapist or a person
 16assisting him at his direction; and:
17(i)   the force is used for the purpose of
 18administering a recognized form of treatment not
 19prohibited by law of this Commonwealth which the actor
 20believes to be adapted to promoting the physical or
 21mental health of the patient; and
22(ii)   the treatment is administered with the consent
 23of the patient, or, if the patient is a minor or an
 24incapacitated person with the consent of his parent or
 25guardian or other person legally competent to consent in
 26his behalf, or the treatment is administered in an
 27emergency when the actor believes that no one competent
 28to consent can be consulted and that a reasonable person,
 29wishing to safeguard the welfare of the patient, would
 30consent.
						1(5)   The actor is a warden or other authorized official
 2of a correctional institution; and:
3(i)   he believes that the force used is necessary for
 4the purpose of enforcing the lawful rules or procedures
 5of the institution, unless his belief in the lawfulness
 6of the rule or procedure sought to be enforced is
 7erroneous and his error is due to ignorance or mistake as
 8to the provisions of this title, any other provision of
 9the criminal law or the law governing the administration
 10of the institution;
11(ii)   the nature or degree of force used is not
 12forbidden by law; and
13(iii)   if deadly force is used, its use is otherwise
 14justifiable under this chapter.
15(6)   The actor is a person responsible for the safety of
 16a vessel or an aircraft or a person acting at his direction;
 17and:
18(i)   he believes that the force used is necessary to
 19prevent interference with the operation of the vessel or
 20aircraft or obstruction of the execution of a lawful
 21order, unless his belief in the lawfulness of the order
 22is erroneous and his error is due to ignorance or mistake
 23as to the law defining his authority; and
24(ii)   if deadly force is used, its use is otherwise
 25justifiable under this chapter.
26(7)   The actor is a person who is authorized or required
 27by law to maintain order or decorum in a vehicle, train or
 28other carrier or in a place where others are assembled; and:
29(i)   he believes that the force used is necessary for
 30such purpose; and
						1(ii)   the force used is not designed to cause death,
 2or known to create a substantial risk of causing death,
 3bodily injury, or extreme mental distress.
4(b)   Use of force not justifiable.--The use of force upon or
 5toward the person of another is not justifiable if:
6(1)   the actor knows that he can avoid the necessity of
 7using such force with complete safety by retreating; or
8(2)   the actor was instructed by a peace officer or
 9public safety dispatcher to not pursue another person.
10Section 5.   This act shall take effect in 60 days.